Sitting Ducks, Herded Sheep and the Boiling Frog
- Nov 17, 2025
- 9 min read
Updated: Nov 19, 2025
The Great Reset, Part 1: We Are About to See What the People of This World Are Really Made Of
If you are in the US, you may have heard rumblings about the push to create digital identification for all people the world over. It tangentially came up with COVID when there was an attempt to roll out vaccine passports. Thankfully, public outcry from both sides of the issue caused the bureaucrats behind it to retreat.
If you are in the UK and other parts of Europe, you are hearing about mandatory digital ID because you are amidst the latest guise to sell something as good, when in fact, it is so very not. At least not ostensibly and when you acknowledge that the following three things are true.
Government is not a trustworthy entity.
Politicians lie beyond anything the average person can fathom.
The greed of the people in power knows no limit.
We know this to be so because we watch it unfold every day, all day, before our very eyes.
So, what’s the end game?
Some say, safety, convenience and efficiency while others say it’s an attempt to funnel us into one global system like sheep being led to slaughter.
But, which is it?
The only way to answer that intelligibly is to explore who wants this and why. Notably, the roll out of something like this must be multi-layered, because in order to force controls upon people, lieutenants, yes-men and lackeys are needed to roll out a grand plan, in this case, otherwise known as The Great Reset.
In his #1 New York Times Bestseller, The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism, (Simon & Shuster), Glenn Beck asserts it is:
An international conspiracy between powerful bankers, business leaders, and government officials; closed-door meetings in the Swiss Alps; and calls for a radical transformation of every society on earth. The Great Reset is not a work of fiction. It is a highly influential movement among the world’s elite to “reset” the global economy using banks, government programs, and environmental, social, and governance metrics. If they are successful and the Great Reset is finalized, it would put substantially more economic and social power in the hands of large corporations, international institutions, banks, and government officials, the United Nations, and many of the members of the World Economic Forum.
The World Economic Forum claims The Great Reset is an initiative proposed aimed at rebuilding the global economy in a sustainable way following the COVID-19 pandemic. It emphasizes creating fairer outcomes, advancing sustainable development, and leveraging technology for societal benefit by 1) A focus on creating fairer outcomes for all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and communities; 2) building a more resilient and equitable economy using environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, and 3) harnessing technological innovations to improve economic and social systems.
There are legitimate arguments being made for both sides. Of course, who doesn’t want better safety, security and efficiency? But, at the same time, who does want to relinquish personal freedom of choice to a corrupt system of government? No one, though someone wants to impose the latter in the name of the former. Right now we are in the test phase in different pockets around the world.
It's as convoluted a tale as any could be and it requires some real expertise to tell it. This is expertise I don’t have. But there are several people who do.
The first is Whitney Webb who is considered by many to be the most prolific researcher of our time. If you know anything about her two-volume series, One Nation Under Blackmail, you will likely agree. Between the two tomes, she unearths decades-long misconduct, corruption and connections between people throughout the entire political sphere, people who you wouldn’t have thought should be, or would be, connected. She does this in 974 pages of meticulous research. She speaks on podcasts and interviews as well, which is primarily how I know of her work. From those I’ve pulled a sampling for your information.
Another woman who has played a significant role in awakening my consciousness is Catherine Austin Fitts. Credentialed out the wazoo and a graduate of Wharton Business School, Catherine served as managing director and member of the board of directors of the Wall Street investment bank Dillon, Read & Co. Inc., was Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and was the president of Hamilton Securities Group, Inc where she designed and closed over $25 billion of transactions and investments and led portfolio and investment strategy for $300 billion. Currently, she leads The Solari Report, which is chockfull of research and resources.
Like Whitney, she speaks with remarkable clarity and knowledge. One such example was during a Seminar on Economic Issues and Controversies at Hillsdale College where she encourages people listening to consider the difference between “reality” and “official reality,” noting that the two are far from related and often actually in direct opposition of each other.
Separately, in a conversation with Tucker Carlson, Catherine explains why no one in government is ever held accountable and why nothing ever changes. It’s because they don’t want it to. Both parties don’t want it to. The charade is known as the Uniparty. And when the blinders come off and a clearer picture forms, it becomes obvious that it does not matter which party we stand with because they are operating as one organism, not two. And the proof; both parties continue to stoke division and hatred. Neither has actually done anything to unite us, despite both stating exactly that as their respective goal. No. They would rather antagonize hostility among us because it’s the only way for them to protect themselves. What matters more is that we stand together. It is a full interview covering multiple topics, but you can take a glimpse of a short clip here on CPAC.
Finally, there is this guy I discovered listening to Joe Rogan. Maajeed Nawaz explains what the rollout looks like in real time, now. It’s a typical JR interview, so it’s long. For a quick preview here is a a 4-minute recap.
Meanwhile, Bobby Kennedy cautioned us years ago that this plan was in the works, led by the WEF and the WHO. Everyone was quick to call him a conspiracy theorist, but is he?
Keir Starmer, PM of the UK, launched mandatory digital ID’s in October as a condition of employment despite a petition holding three million signatures.
30 people daily are being arrested for social media posts in the UK. In one notable case, Graham Linehan, one of Britain’s most successful sitcom writers and co-creator of Father Ted, was arrested at Heathrow airport on suspicion of inciting violence over posts he made on X mocking males identifying as transgender. Five armed officers told him he was under arrest for three tweets.
Vietnam froze the bank accounts of 86 million people for noncompliance with biometric identity requirements with plans to delete them entirely for those who don’t comply. Money is not released and customers are not granted access to their accounts unless they comply with the government mandate.
Carbon footprint scores are starting to show up on food packaging that literally say,
“Eating this uses X% of your daily dietary carbon allowance.”
Natwest bank has implemented a carbon footprint tracker.
The UK has completed a trial testing a carbon credit system. “It sets a daily allowance for each person—in effect, a limit on your ability to purchase food, clothing, goods, and travel as you have always done. The limit has been set at 20kg of carbon emissions per day, with food restricted to 2600g. Food manufacturers are cooperating by adding a carbon statement on their packaging to inform consumers how much of their allowance each product consume. A packet of cheese accounts for 1100g—almost half of your daily carbon allowance.”
Visa is rolling out biometric payment systems.
EU just made cash payments over 10,000 illegal.
The Canadian government froze bank accounts during the COVID truckers’ convoy in Canada because officials did not approve of citizens voicing concerns about vaccine side effects. Funds were ultimately released.
Barbara Baarsma is a Dutch economist and agenda contributor for the World Economic Forum who literally said out loud, on camera, that rich people could buy social credits or "rights" to travel from poor people who didn’t have enough money to go anywhere.
This “program” is not an identification system as they claim. We have those. They know who we are, and for that matter, where we are already and how much money we have through passports, driver licenses, social security cards, insurance cards, birth certificates, tax returns, vehicle registrations, property records, credit cards, flight records, medical records, EZ Pass, ATMS, transit cards, IP addresses, etc… No. This is an app they want on our phones, linked to our digital wallets to centralize control and usurp our freedom to live and make decisions that are right for us and our loved ones.
We know China has long wanted to undermine democratic principles and replace them with autocratic rule wherever possible, and especially in the US, because our freedom is a direct threat to the control they exert over their people. All people, wherever they are, would rather be free than under the control of malevolent forces. Further, I would argue that benevolent forces have no interest in taking control of people's money and lives. Despite that, China continues to rigorously attempt to reshape the world order in favor of authoritarian governance using the same technology we are being told is so necessary for security and convenience. So when China does it it's Communism and when other countries do it, it's all in the name of making our lives better?
I think not. Becasue seriously, is life better?
Of course, we don’t know how all of this is going to play out. But all things considered, it doesn’t look good. There are certainly enough questionable events happening around the world to raise legitimate questions, the biggest of which is, “Who’s lying?”
Indicators point to it not being the conspiracy theorists, who more often than not end up being right once the truth eeks out of the mainstream media. But rather, it’s the people in government. For example, a recent Pew Research poll shows a continuing trend downward in trust in government since 1958, dipping to its lowest in 2023 to 16%. Meanwhile, Dr. Mercola, trashed as the biggest conspiracy theorist of all, started sounding alarms about The Great Reset as early as 2020.
Now of course, officials know they have lost the trust of the public, and as a result, we have already seen how they try to get around it: Backdoor it through the private sector and make it a condition of trade – product or service in exchange for compliance and obedience. This is the new face of mandates. Not quite as bad as having a gun held to your head, but not much better either.
Ralph Waldo Emerson was famous for saying, “'Who you are speaks so loudly I can't hear what you're saying.” And that seems to be where we are. It’s a matter of credibility and who has it.
Both Sides of the Story
This is the underlying infrastructure set forth by the World Economic Forum:
This is what critics say is the underlying truth:
Certainly, time will tell, but in the meantime, we have an opportunity before us to avoid the fate of the boiling frog, who in the famous apologue, doesn’t know he is slowly being cooked to death. The analogy being that if you drop a frog in boiling water, it will leap out. But, if on a slow gradual simmer instead, the frog will not detect the danger and will ultimately be boiled alive. A metaphor, apropos for the times in which we are living that illustrates how the inability or unwillingness to face the potential of a sinister threat makes it much easier to implement if the threats arise incrementally and gradually rather than suddenly.
All this to say, imagine how different that outcome would be for the frog if it had been free to choose not to go into the pot in the first place. I’m not saying it is going to happen. None of us know. Only God does. What I am saying is that if there is even a 1% chance that any of this could happen, we are sitting ducks unless we are open to considering that an unwanted reality may be upon us.
The war between good and evil, freedom and control, giving and taking and ego and spirit have been with us since the beginning of time. What's different today is the extent to which technology can compound efforts and proliferate them not only exponentially, but also invisibly. And since our governments have proven to have no interest in transparency, we kind of have to figure this out for ourselves. And to that end, I do not believe that bad actors with malicious intent have any idea what kind of power they are up against when faced with the power of the human spirit.
Comments