Is A Dystopian or Utopian Future Ahead?
- Apr 8
- 6 min read
Updated: 4 days ago

stopian future
My mother, who recently turned 99 years old said it best when she said, “We are living in epic times.” It was particularly interesting coming from someone who has been on this planet for almost 100 years. And in those 100 years, she notes that she has watched our governing systems rot from the inside out. She shares the discontent of many who are much younger than she and not happy with the way the world is. The big difference though, is that she knows a world from another time that few of us can imagine.
On the other end of the spectrum, though, there is a future world on our doorstep that is equally as hard to imagine. I wrote about what could lie ahead in my last post, parsing out some of the things happening in the world now, that if true, will play out to be as dystopian for our kids as my mother’s, in contrast, seems utopian to those who followed her. Of course, her generation experienced real war times and The Great Depression which brought with it its own trauma. But up against the onset of technocratic rule, social media distortion and mobile phone addictions, the simplicity of the 20th century conjures the charm of old-world markets and county fairs.
Life was contained within the parameters of work, family, community, and for many, church. There wasn’t a universal obsession with monetizing everything. They weren’t vulnerable to online hacks and security breaches. And perhaps most importantly, they were not being manipulated every waking moment to think a certain way and do a certain thing so as to behave according to what other people – complete strangers – decided was best.
In my last post I led with the recent push in The UK to force people to comply with a digital ID scheme. Since then, Kier Starmer, the PM, has walked back the compulsory nature of it due to the citizens’ outrage over having something foisted upon them that was never put to a vote and that millions vehemently oppose.
In a nutshell, there appears to be a subset of people in power who are suspected of coordinating mechanisms like digital ID and digital currency to wrest control of the global population in order to roll out the equivalent of China’s social credit system everywhere. It has been referred to as The New World Order, The Great Reset and Globalization. The three key components link your biometric data (fingerprints, iris scans, facial scans) to a digital ID number tied to a centralized system (that has no national boundaries) to a bank account (God knows where) wherein you can only access your money if the people controlling the system say you can. So, let’s be real. It’s not money at that point. It’s digital, programmable tokenization swallowed by a system that can exert control with the push of a button.
Prof. Dr. Richard Werner spoke at the European Parliament arguing against reliance on Digital ID, the use of central bank digital currency and the planned tokenisation of all assets, including nature and the air we breathe. In doing so, he effectively explained the creation of this nightmarish digital prison desired by the central planners who work to curtail our rights and freedoms. 👇
It’s always about the money. Always. Always. Always.
Those raising flags have been accused of spreading conspiracy theories, and by extension, are considered not grounded in reality, and by extension, marginalized as being crazy or stupid or both. But with the drop of The Epstein Files we have learned that crazy and stupid is merely the PR strategy of deflection for the evil and depraved. We’ve learned our national, and dare I say global, situation is far worse than any actual conspiracy any normal - and paranoid - person could have come up with. Our country is being run from every corner by pedophiles and degenerates.
Let that sink in.
A highly organized network of the most impaired, perverted and deformed people on earth are making decisions about our health and our lives – and implementing them.
Let that sink in too.
Now we know. For sure. Not democrats. Not republicans. Monsters. All of them. They knew. They hid it. And they lied about it for decades, which is why I am now even more inclined to believe that every conspiracy our political parties name as such, is the actual truth. It’s all right there in the files, laid bare for all to see.
Coming in at three million documents, there does, in fact, appear to be an alarming amount of evidence behind the rumors that have swirled about for years, which when illuminated, are more like diabolical plans to rule the universe than they are kooky conspiratorial storylines from which sci-films are made.
Reading the files and adjacent analyses was the proverbial nail in the coffin for me. I’m now convinced that the 2030 Agenda, which is the working name for the actual plan set forth by the World Economic Forum, is not a legitimate sustainability effort aiming to craft a more equitable society for all, as they claim. Rather, it is a guise to capture society and swallow it whole by the most heinous people on earth. More specifically, it is a scheme to continue the redistribution of wealth that became most apparent during COVID by trying to convince us that our compliance was necessary in order to save the world from itself. Meanwhile, all it really did was move more money to the top 1%.
Since then, The World Economic Forum is on record, in writing on their own website, saying that COVID was a test of “social responsibility.”

Oh, so not really a virus?
And what did the billionaire set get for our collective sense of responsibility? Have a look:
With COVID as the testing ground for compliance, the vision for our future has been laid out to look something like this:

The ruse is grounded in carbon metrics. Hence, the name, My Carbon. The thing to notice here is the execution plan. It all happens through our phones. This, for me, is where it gets really interesting.
Remember with COVID? The vaccine passports? You couldn’t fly unless you had been vaccinated with something we now know was far less “proven” than they claimed. Not by even a long shot. The people who were not convinced or who had medical/religious exemptions, who by the way, were ignored, simply did not fly during that period.
Short term, the world was on fire and airlines were subsidized by the government for a cool $63B. But long term, is another story entirely. For argument’s sake, let’s suppose a mere 10% of customers pulled back or postponed their air travel plans during the short enforcement time. Do we think businesses such as Jet Blue, American, United Airlines et. al., will passively sit back and accept a 10% (or more) decline in sales over the long term if they try to force unwanted medicine, or food, or products on us in exchange for an airline ticket being controlled through digital means and digital banks by people behind a curtain? Those CEOs know that they do not have a healthy, thriving business if it relies on government subsidies over paying customers to stay alive, let alone grow.
And what if it’s not something as fluid as possibly adjusting travel plans? What if it is food or medicine or how many flights people can take based the amount of carbon they have used? What if your new My Carbon app says compliance is necessary to access your money, which would only be accessible through your digital wallet - on your phone? And what if they say that when you do access it, it can only be utilized to buy what government deems best? And what happens when you exceed your monthly allowance of “carbon credits?” They are pushing it through without showing any interest in addressing these types of questions and concerns, just like they did with COVID.
I mean, seriously, what will happen when people realize that the phone is the only thing connecting them to digital rule and reign over their lives? And perhaps more interestingly, how will Apple feel when some portion of its customer base says, "F these phones?" dystopian future
A world without smart phones? Can you even imagine?





Comments