Covid Questions Are Mounting

I lost my innocence on this one.

The big question on many minds over the past few years has been from people who wanted to know if the mRNA injections were safe, myself among them, as is made evident from most of the posts I’ve written on this blog.

There simply was not enough time to gather adequate information from the trials about the side effects for various groups and subgroups of the population who may be affected differently. Pregnant women are a good example of this. Children are another. And pre-existing conditions and disease are another.

Now, going on 4 years later, we’ve had some time. Time to look at what had not been looked at before rolling out – and mandating - this novel technology known more accurately as gene therapy than as vaccination which has always, until now, meant immunization.

Studies are rolling in and beginning to answer existing questions that have persisted over the course of the pandemic, and also, they are raising new ones.

Questions like:

1. Where are the public health notices about the side effects reported on the government’s own VAERSreport (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and V-Safe data? Much of this data is summarized here.

2. How many times have unvaccinated people with natural immunity had COVID versus vaccinated people?

3. Why did the FDA approve Remdesivir to treat COVID for people with kidney problems when they know the drug is highly toxic to kidneys and causes kidney problems?

4. Why did so many young and/or healthy people die in the last few years of sudden and mysterious deaths shortly after they had been vaccinated or boosted? Where are the inquiries into this unprecedented uptick in sudden deaths among our youth?

5. Why is it that a recent Cleveland Clinic study is showing that the more “up to date” you are on your vaccinations, the more likely you are to contract COVID?

6. Why is variability in batches not being studied to make sure we have better quality control next time? Surely, if there were faulty batches, a deeper dive into the accelerated “warp speed” nature of the manufacturing process is necessary.

7. Why was the Facebook Group for people injured by the vaccine removed abruptly even though the people gathering there looking for help and support had, in truth, been injured by the vaccine?

8. Of the billions and trillions of dollars the government collects in taxes, the drug companies made on this experimental therapy and the media outlets collect in advertising revenue from said drug companies, why has there been no allocation of funds put toward answering the follow up questions, educating the public and helping the injured? A small fraction of what they pocketed would go a long way.

9. Why didn't they pull this product from the market when they hit the standard threshold of 50 reported safety issues like they have done in the past.? Instead, the adverse event reports for just this one shot have surpassed all other vaccines, combined.

10. We know some people have died after receiving this injection. The CDC says so themselves. So, how many? What is the percentage? We need to know what the actual odds of being hurt or killed from this novel therapeutic approach to infectious disease are.

Ryan Cole, MD, is one person not only asking, but he is also someone who is at least trying to answer a myriad of questions, that at this point, need to be addressed. He is a pathologist. I find him credible.

He says that mostly everyone is okay from these shots. That’s a relief. But he also estimates that about 15% are not. That's a concern.

So, my biggest question is now: Where are the efforts to solve the problems emerging from the latest data? Why is it crickets on every front?

The data is there. Yet, instead of getting any kind of post mortem analysis, we get a shot that is 0% effective, 15% dangerous with a side of 100% BS, which you can see firsthand in this Australian Senate hearing with Pfizer and Moderna.

I never really considered myself to be naive becasue I thought, for sure, once we had the benefit of time, we would have a national dialogue, scientific exploration, public debate and review lessons learned.

As I wait, though, I've a feeling that I'm not in Kansas anymore.